|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
The Ball Controversy
Dear Jifflers,
'Boy,
Howdy' to use an old American
greeting from bygone days. I must
admit that I'm very proud right now
of American soccer
and in particular the USA's
performance in this 2010 World Cup.
So far they are one of the most, if
not the most, entertaining of teams
to watch in this tournament. And,
after all, this is about
entertainment. Although many will
differ, the truth is that football is
not one of the necessary elements to
sustain life (food, shelter,
clothing) but before anything else, I
have to comment on this
World
Cup 2010 Adidas
ball.
Without argument, and somehow
unbelievably overlooked by 80% of the
common public, which is an incredible
statistic in itself, the single most
important piece of equipment in
soccer-football is indeed the BALL
itself. I've said this all before (a
lot) and after 20 years even the JiFL
has finally recognized this fact and
standardized with a league
ball starting last summer with the
advent of the 2009-10 season. Since
then, I personally have only heard
compliments and praise from the
players with that super important of
fundamental changes in the standard
and organization of this league. And
after all, even the German
Bundesliga is finally doing
the same thing this upcoming season
by subscribing to a uniform league
ball just as the English
Premier League already
did some 15 years ago.
But now,
right now, there is loads of
controversy going on with
complaints up and down the
spectrum including all types of
opinions from the extreme left and
to the conservative right about
this $130. USd priced soccer ball
named the Adidas
Jambulani
(in Indonesia called
'Jamulani' with
cheap copies available at Taman
Puring for $10 USd). Should
you go on the internet and do a bit
of research then you will find that
it seems to be the Nike
sponsored players and
teams who are whining the loudest
about Adidas's perfectly round
patent. Do I think that Nike could
have put it's own branded players
and teams into the stew pot to
criticize Adidas? For sure and
some of that is going on with no
doubt about it. That is business.
Happens all the time. One business
tries to criticize the other in an
attempt to legitimize its own
reputation or product. This
strategy usually backfires because
as the saying goes:
(Eventually) you got to put your
money where your mouth is! So
whatever one criticizes must be met
with either a superior service or a
better product. So then... is the
Nike ball better? No. Not at all.
It is not even a particularly good
ball itself even though it is in
use in the EPL. It is just an
average ball with no particular
liveliness or energy to it. But it
is sufficient. Personally, I find
it a bit lifeless and lacking
personality. In fact, I will be
happy to see the end of that
particular line of Nike creations.
And I think that Nike should stick
with shoes and clothing and let
others create the balls that we are
supposed to be playing with simply
because the lower end Nike balls as
as bad as those useless plastic
glue on panel balls (still being
produced) that Mikasa
invented back in the 1970's after
the 1974 World Cup. So, in
conclusion, a lot of guerilla
marketing is what is really behind
the scenes here and what is really
going on with this ball
controversy.
≡
Click here to check
the latest on the ball controversy
There is no argument that this
ball is faster and lighter then
any previous WC ball. This is
admitted freely by Dr. Harland,
the developer of this ball. But
the best test of any ball is
actually the players themselves
(now be patient for a second as I
rant for a moment here) and
certainly not the fans and
non-players who should hold their
opinions entirely to themselves
as they have no idea what they
are talking about since they
don't know what it is to play
with that particular ball or in
fact know nothing at all about
what it is to play at any of
these levels and, in many cases,
have no idea what it is to even
play the beautiful game of
football at all. They just watch
it and vicariously live it
through imagination but they have
no grounds for their useless
opinions (see the article
mentioned above).
So
yes the ball is problematic in
this World Cup for sure. It is
obvious to see. But if you all
can recall, so was the original Tango
back in '78. Those that remember
that time period surely will
recall, with a just a little
effort, that the less skilled
players found it difficult to
play with and complained even
back then. Yet the skilled
players loved it and ultimately
we all adjusted and now the Tango
is considered the greatest ball
ever produced.

But I have to bring
Bernhard Schumm back into
the public spotlight because he
said one of the most profound items
of common sense heard in ages. He
freely admits that the ball is
faster and a bit lighter and that
if you hit it just right (in the
sweet-spot) it will fly like a
wicked rocket nearly spin-less like
a knuckleball at the target. But
if you hit it anywhere else it will
misfire and fly anywhere BUT that
intended target. In other words,
it can make a good player look
bad. But what he actually said
was: 'The ball has been on
sale since January. Any player
could have gone to the store and
bought himself one and by now he
would be accustomed to it so I'm
sorry - no excuses (accepted)'.
And I agree. If you thought that
you might be chosen to represent
your country at this year's World
Cup finals then you should have
done just that. The German
teams that are sponsored by Adidas
have been using it in their league
this year so obviously they are
indeed used to it by now and it
showed in the German's 4-0 victory
the other night. And the super
skilled Spanish players looked like
they knew the ball intimately
despite their loss to the Suisse
(which incidentally made Marc
Giovanola so very happy by the
way). Yet, keep in mind that seven
of those Suissers are plying their
trade in the German Bundesliga as
well.
Bernie said another thing about
this ball which got me thinking
even more. He said that this is
the most perfectly round
technological ball ever produced.
His quote because I cannot leave
this subject alone and hit him with
20 SMS's a night: 'Don't
discuss this again. This is the
perfect ball exposing the slightest
technical mistake and reacting to
the softest (of) technical impact
(touches).' And my reaction
is: 'But we are not machines.
We are humans. We rarely do
anything perfect. And maybe, just
maybe, we are not ready for this
advanced ball during this period of
human football history'.
And so here is my conclusion.
Since this is the lowest scoring
World Cup opening round in history:
Bring
back the Tango -
the undisputed best ball of all
time. Every professional player
who ever used it will agree
including Maradona.
And that is the final word on
that! I am accepting no
alternative opinions. Should
Adidas bring it back they will find
that they suddenly will have on
their hands the best selling ball
ever in the history of the game.
If they fail to heed my advice than
well, Nike here is your chance.
Are you reading my words? And, if
you are, than are you understanding
them?
Take care, enjoy the rest of the low
scoring World Cup matches, and see
you live out and about...
And Bernie? You have not heard the
last from me about footballs!
-
The crowning of
new JiFL League Champions and a
discussion on that particular club
-
End of Season
party highlights
-
More World Cup
commentary
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
FC DE HOOI NOMADS, JIFL CUP CHAMPION 2010 |
 |
|
 |
|  |  |
|  |
|
|