|
|
www.jifl.net -
Season 5. Vol.21 |
1. Edito
2. Announcements |
3. Standings
4. Miscellaneous |
|
|
Save the health of the players
Lately, I have been
thinking about something quite a bit and it is going to sound
odd to you at first but after you consider all of the arguments
for and against than it actually starts to seem sound. Are you
ready for this one? Okay here we go: What about a
worldwide ban on slide-tackling? Like you, being a
traditionalist, I was appalled when I first heard it but then I
followed the reasoning and have come to agree with the
rationale. Firstly, let's consider it for a moment. Why do
players resort to slide-tackling in the first place? Isn't
because they are caught in a desperation last ditch effort to
gain the advantage? Which means that they were positioned
incorrectly in the first place. So, logically, if we learn to
play and position ourselves correctly then there should be no
need to resort to that tactic anyway.
But why ban
it? The reason to ban slide-tackling is to save the health of
the players. Nearly every match that I observe, somebody
usually gets damaged to some degree as a result of a
slide-tackle. And I mean this at every level; from the
children's league, up to our league, and straight to the Premier
League, slide-tackling is injurious to football players. That's
a fact beyond dispute. Already tackling from behind is illegal
because the attacking player cannot see it coming. This rule is
in place in order to supposedly allow the soon-to-be-tackled
player to prepare himself and brace for impact but,
nevertheless, injuries are almost exclusively occurring from
dangerous and aggressive slide-tackles. The game has changed.
Players are way faster and bigger nowadays and their approach is
way more specific. The plastics and compounds used in the
shoe bottoms are way harder than materials in the past.
Slide-tackling has almost evolved as the only legal way to
injure somebody in football nowadays. But this is no
longer the 1920's when football was still emerging from the
shadows of the rugby from which it
sprain in 1863. Just
recall that ridiculous and criminal tackle last year on Eduardo
by a defender (who, incidentally, is way too suited for rugby
than football actually). There was even consideration of
amputating his foot at one point. Was the general public
aware of that fact? Whew! Isn't that shocking?
The pictures tell the story themselves so there is no need to
re-cap the incident in words.
|
|
I recall
Cannavaro in the last World Cup '06 and
he was marvelous. Never going to ground but elegantly
kicking
the ball away from the opponent nearly every time and starting
the counter-attack for Italy. Such artistry. And he got
rewarded as Defender of the Tournament for his
excellent and fair play.
That was a sample of the future of football, I believe. But why
wait? Let's bring the future on now. Let's get the discussion
out there now and consider the implications of such a major
change to the game. Please send your comments to
jifl@jifl.net to address this
important issue regarding the future of football. Let's
originate the discussion here. Indeed, I will put you online.
And let's all consider a change for the better; another change
for the good of the game.
See you live on
the pitches,
-Your Hero
S p e c i a l
JIFL A n n o u n c e m e n t s:
|
May 16th afternoon-
JiFL Cup Final -
ISCI - 18:00 PM: Wanderers -vs- JIS /
Grasshoppers |
|
May 23rd morning
-
JiFL Inaugural Golf Tournament:
11:00 AM
tee-off - Pangkilan Jati Golf Course- Cinere |
|
May 23rd evening
-
JiFL 'End of Season' EOS Party:
Eastern
Promise
- Kemang.
20:00 PM -12:00 Midnight. |
|
|